Sunday, October 17, 2010

Shot & Shot Regression [Saving Private Ryan]

     The way in which in a movie is filmed can sometimes be the difference that decides whether a movie is good or great. The angle and different types of shots used to film a scene of a movie has the power to make the viewer feel or react a certain way. Great film makers know how these tactics work, and use them to their advantage. The use of such shot progression and camera angles are brilliantly used in what is one of the best war films of all time, Saving Private Ryan. 
     In the opening scene, once Tom Hanks' character begins to remember his time at war, there are some amazing shots that take place. This scene begins with the soldiers huddled up inside some type of water/land vehicle, waiting to hit land to fight in Normandy on D-Day. The first couple of shots are close ups of some of the soldiers. These shots give the audience a hint of how intense this day really was. The shots help capture the emotional side of the fighting. The cameras then  move on to extreme close ups once the whistles blow to lower the gates to let the soldiers out onto the shore. The important detail is given to us here that the soldiers are about to be let out into war. The cameras zoom in to the wheels/latches that open and shut the gates of the vehicle. From here, the scene turns to a sort of middle shot that shows the American soldiers getting shot at by the enemies. However, this shot does not show who is doing the shooting. Following this, the cameras give a long shot showing the backs of the enemies as they are shooting their American targets. This final shot gives the whole perspective of what is actually taking place and shows us just how large the scale of things is. 

***VIDEO CLIP*** [Saving Private Ryan - D-Day opening scene][Start at 1:21]

     Another scene within this movie is when the American soldiers are attempting to find Private Ryan. They encounter another rally point and find some soldiers who might know where Ryan is. A commander then gives the soldiers a bag full of dog tags, that signify dead soldiers.  The soldiers are instructed to look through the tags to see if they find Private Ryan within the names. The scene begins with a middle shot of about 3 soldiers sitting down at a table sifting through the dog tags. The information provided to the audience here is that there are a plethora of dog tags that in turn means that their have been an equal number of casualties. The next shot is an extreme close up that shows some name on the dog tags. This gives a more detailed perspective on how the tags look. Following this shot is another middle shot showing some other soldiers walking in the background behind the men who are looking through the tags. This shows the audience that the American soldiers are in a pretty public area and that other soldiers are watching them sift through the dog tags of deceased soldiers. This shot then turns into a long shot showing the whole picture of what is actually taking place. From here a close up on the Airborne soldiers passing by in the background, shows the audience the reality that some of their friends and companions names are in the pile of dog tags that the American soldiers are laughing about while searching through them.

***VIDEO CLIP*** [Saving Private Ryan - Dog Tag scene][Start at 4:03]


     Shots and shot progression are definitely some very important aspects that help tell a story much better. The feelings that an audience feels vary by the film styles and angles used in filming certain scenes. The fact of the matter is that so much can be said by simply filming a scene in a certain type of shot. Saving Private Ryan took advantage of such shots and thus went on to win a plethora of Oscar awards for being such an amazing film.

Sunday, October 10, 2010

The Studio System

     Between the 1920' and 1940's, America was in the historical period which we now call, "Classical Hollywood."At this time, the entire film industry was controlled by the Big Eight producers-distributors. They were MGM, Paramount, RKO, 20th Century Fox, Warner Bros., United Artists, Universal, and Columbia. Combined, these studios had access to and controlled every portion of the film industry. They owned theaters, controlled the flow of products, and locked out the competition in both the distribution and exhibition sectors. However, what was perhaps one of their greatest weapons was their ability to contract talent. Having control of popular actors, producers, and directors meant that these studios could market and advertise their talent in hopes of luring in customers and ultimately gaining more profit.
     An effect from contracting talent on the studios was that it somewhat forced them to stay within a certain box or genre. This contracting of talent would intertwine with the studios star system. This was the best representation of what a certain studio did and what it was known for. However, this limited what kinds of films a studio could create. If all they had on contract was serious actors who were always portrayed in gangster/detective films, all they could make were gangster/detective films. Stars under contract were known specifically for what type of role they commonly portrayed. Such as MGM star Judy Garland. She was contracted to this studio as a child and was kept under this same studio for years. She was best-known for her role in the film "The Wizard of Oz." In nearly every film she was in, she displayed a consistent set of character traits that was associated with a certain genre.
     An example of just how much control these studios had over their contracted talent involves Judy Garland. Studios would use their stars to promote other stars within their studio. Such as when MGM had Judy Garland sing a song to Clark Gable. By doing so, not only was MGM promoting a very young Judy Garland, they were also reminding the public that Clark Gable was under their studio as well. It was pretty much like killing two birds with one stone, in that they were showing their relatively new talent and their already established superstar. 
     Overall, the power that these studio systems had was incredible. They literally had control over every single aspect of the film industry and could shape it however they wished. Today, things are much more different and different groups control certain parts of the industry. This era truly was a historical period for not only film, but for the country as a whole.

***VIDEO CLIP***
==> MGM's Judy Garland singing to Clark Gable [Dear Mr. Gable]

Sunday, October 3, 2010

"All In The Family"

     The TV sitcom "All In The Family", was voted one of TV Guide's "50 Greatest Shows of All Time" and stars Archie Bunker (Carroll O'Conner) who was voted Bravo's "TV's Greatest Character of All Time." This show was known for breaking grounds with the stories that it's characters appeared in. At the time, the show depicted several controversial issues that no other sitcom dared to take part in. Such issues dealt with racism, cancer, rape, poverty, homosexuality, and many other topics that, at the time, most American's were not comfortable speaking about.
     A show that is somewhat similar to "All In The Family" and is getting rave reviews in today's modern society, is the TV sitcom called "Modern Family." This show also tackles some of the same topics that were covered in "All In The Family." The show is based around three of couples that are all related. One of the couples is an older male who has re-married a younger Columbian woman. He has a daughter who is married to the average modern male. They are the second couple who pretty much live the average American life. He also has a son who is homosexual,  lives with his partner, and adopted a child. The issues are the same that "All In The Family" talked about. 
     Despite these shows focusing and talking about similar topics, they still happen to be very different. When "All In The Family" talked about homosexuality and similar issues, it was something that the American public was almost embarrassed to watch, much less speak about. The issues were much more controversial in the 1970's.  Also, the show wasn't truly centered around controversial characters, except for Archie Bunker being depicted as a bigot. "Modern Family" differentiates itself by having the main characters deal with such controversial topics. The main character has divorced and re-married a much younger/attractive Columbian woman. That itself is something that decades ago would have stirred up much debate. Furthermore, the son of this man is homosexual, lives with his partner, and has adopted a child. All three of those facts are something that nowadays, doesn't truly shock the American public. The issues remain the same, but the public's perception towards them has significantly changed for the better in my opinion.
     The topic of racism is something that was focused on much more in "All In The Family" than in "Modern Family." A reason for this might be that given the time, 1970's, "All In The Family" was based upon the strong racism that was asserted between whites and blacks. Racism was a much larger topic back then than it is now. The main character in "All In The Family" is a bigot, while in "Modern Family" some of the lead characters are homosexual. There is a big difference in time, which is what leads to different topics being focused on more. In the 1970's racism was the big topic, but in today's society, equal rights for homosexuals is what stirs up debate. It's not so much that "Modern Family" doesn't cover what "All In The Family" did, but rather that "Modern Family" focuses on the major issue that is on the American public's minds in today's society.


***VIDEO CLIPS***
"All In The Family" - Homsexuality

==> This clip shows Archie Bunker from "All In The Family" taking one look at Roger and labeling him as being a homosexual right away. Start at 2:37.





"Modern Family" - Car Moment

==> This is a clip from "Modern Family" showing a conversation between the two homosexual partners speaking about how they make a perfect team/couple. Mentions parenting skills and adoption.




"Modern Family" - On Homosexuality in America
==> This clips shows one of the homosexual characters speaking up about how he is proud that his role is opening up more people to realizing that homosexuals are just the same as any other types of people. He wants people to realize that we are all more alike than different.